![]() |
Test Results Are In!
2 Attachment(s)
Some of you may remember that I had a crankshaft failure at Norwalk last year. It was an 11:1 .035 over 455. OE block and crank, Eagle rods, SRP pistons, SD Performance 325 cfm CNC heads, Comp Street Roller cam 266/272 duration on a 110, right at .650 net lift, 4150 Northwind intake with a 2" tapered spacer/adapter and a 1050 Dominator. TH350 with a 10" PTC that flashes to 5000 and 3.73 gears, 275/60R15 ET Street Radials. It was a good running combo and I hated to loose the shortblock but that happens sometimes using a 50+ year old cast crank.
Moving forward I decided to go with an All Pontiac aluminum block, 4.350" Mahle pistons and rings, Molnar 6.8 rods and a Molnar 4.375" crank. It comes out to 520 ci and it has the same 11:1 compression as the 463. I used the same heads, cam, intake and carb. I got it together just in time to take it to Norwalk this year for it's first passes. Interesting that the bore/stroke ratio is the same for both engines. The aluminum block is supposed to be about 60 lbs lighter than an OE block but I added weight back to the car with motor plates, heavy trans bellhousing and remote oil filter system. The car should be within 10-20 lbs of what it was before. I really didn't know what to expect on the track. I knew it was possible that it wouldn't pick up much if it did at all if the cam/heads were already maxed out on the 463. Anyway, the 2 time slips here show the fastest passes from last year and this year. This is with no carb tuning and conservative timing on the 520. Needless to say, I'm very happy with the results! |
The results look fantastic to me. What was the upshift rpm, trap rpm?
|
Quote:
|
Did you spin on the last run?
Looks like good time for the 9.77 pass. :) |
Quote:
|
Oh, OK. Went by the date and times on the app.
That's a good improvement still. :) Probably happy with that. (other than the red light :eek:) :) |
What does the car weigh?
|
Quote:
|
The 10.229 last year at Norwalk is 610 Hp calculated using ET and weight. Your 9.93 was 666 Hp and your new 9.779 is 697 Hp, so you got an additional 31 Hp (approximately) from the increase in 57 cubes neglecting weather differences.
|
Quote:
|
Nice improvement!
Just curious what valves (intake and exhaust) are in your heads? |
Quote:
|
I think this is a huge success.
What size headers? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That thing was flying this weekend. I’m glad everything went so well for its first time out. I bet there is more there with a little tuning
|
Quote:
|
You keep going faster and faster.
Damb good job buddy. GT |
Fantastic job! Well done!
|
Good job!
|
Fantastic! It was a pleasure meeting you and your wife as well!
|
Thanks guys!
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It’s funny the things in life that make us happy. I would of been peeing my pants with joy over that improvement!
|
Congratulations!
What is the weight loss with the new block? |
Quote:
Quote:
I haven't scaled the car since the changes, but I imagine it is within 20 lbs of the 3300 it was before since I added motor plates and a remote oil filter. The IAIIA block is supposed to be 138 lbs, OE blocks 195-205 lbs and IAII iron 245 lbs. My block weighed in at 127 lbs after machine work, drilling the deck and opening the oil drains in the valley. That is with the main caps installed. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM. |