PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together

PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php)
-   Pontiac - Street (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=418)
-   -   66 rocker arms on 72 heads (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=397072)

66catalina 04-18-2004 09:45 AM

I am trying to put 66 389 rocker arms on my 72 400 heads. I was wondering if this interchange is possible. I thought that all the rocker arms were the same but apparently I was wrong. Is there supposed to be a spacer under the rocker or somthing that I am missing of my 400 heads sot he rocker has somthing to rest on?

66catalina 04-18-2004 09:45 AM

I am trying to put 66 389 rocker arms on my 72 400 heads. I was wondering if this interchange is possible. I thought that all the rocker arms were the same but apparently I was wrong. Is there supposed to be a spacer under the rocker or somthing that I am missing of my 400 heads sot he rocker has somthing to rest on?

FritzCat 04-18-2004 09:53 AM

The rockers are the same, but the pushrods are different. I believe the later heads use longer pushrods.

b-man 04-18-2004 10:14 AM

'61 -'67 (except '67 061, 670, 97 & 997 heads) used the 8.715" pushrod.

'67 and later (except 256/301) used the 9.145" pushrod.

The special Ram Air II/IV/V and early Super Duty engines used various different lengths and diameters.

You need pushrods that match your '72 heads, 9.145".

Kenth 04-18-2004 10:22 AM

1966 389 and 1972 400 rockers are NOT the same!
The 389`s rockers are shorter, as are the push rods.
This is due to different valve angle in the heads.
The rocker is not resting on anything, it´s hold in place by the end of the valve stem and the push rod.

66catalina 04-19-2004 05:27 AM

I did get the later pushrods. I just wasnt sure if the rockers would work.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.