PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together

PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php)
-   Suspension TECH (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=421)
-   -   67 gto rear spring numbers (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=548927)

trv24217 01-28-2008 08:46 PM

67 gto rear spring numbers
 
Hello everyone,
I need to raise up my rear suspension about 2 inches. All 4 springs were just replaced as stock height. Does any one have part numbers and manufactures info I could use.
I found the Moog rear springs mc5399 are for the Tempest station wagon. I want the car to sit level to just a tad tail high. Any sugestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
Tom

Jerry H. 01-28-2008 11:56 PM

Did you use Moog springs as your stock replacements? If so, what # did you use?

Pontirag 01-29-2008 01:03 AM

Moog wagon springs work great and give it that tail up look with out going stink bug. Nice firm ride without doing kidney damage. Dont want to go too crazy on spring/ride firmness with a convertible or your frame and body start to flex too(much?). you can only go so radical with suspension on a convertible then the bondo starts chunkin out of the rockers and the doors get hard to open and harder to close.

trv24217 01-29-2008 06:30 AM

my springs
 
The former owner used springs from Ames Performance, he used standard replacement front # s322, and he used convertable springs # s362 in the rear. The car is a hardtop with auto tranny and no a/c.

engineer 01-29-2008 03:32 PM

will not get a 2 inch height change using factory station wagon springs. must use a taller spring than that. look at spring catalog listings and height charts

trv24217 01-29-2008 04:18 PM

Thanks, I lifted the back of the car with a floor jack and 1 inch over stock height may be the answer.

Jerry H. 01-29-2008 10:03 PM

I have a set of Moog CC501? that I bought years ago for a 67 GTO rear that I never installed. They were supposed to be variable rate(?). I had used a set of those before and it gave it a nice set up in the rear, just a hair over the front. What most don't remember is that these early cars were way down in the rear when they were new. Take a look at some of the old TV ads for these cars. They look like the rear springs are worn out.

trv24217 01-30-2008 01:03 PM

Thanks, Many car's of the 60's era were low sitting. The car does look nice stock height.

getmygoat 02-06-2008 04:49 PM

archives
 
Here is a thread that provides additional info that may be helpful:

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=492474

trv24217 02-06-2008 06:59 PM

Thanks for the info, I may look into getting a pair made 1 inch taller than stock.

nadmik 02-09-2008 07:17 PM

I have a '66 LeMans Convertibile and put in '66 LeMans station wagon springs. It lifted the car at least 1 inch from stock and slightly higher than the front. I used air conditioning springs in the front on a non-air car...just for a little extra height.

It's been 6 years..car still looks and drives good.

Hope this helps


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.