![]() |
70-72 Bumper Plating
Curiosity post, ignore freely...
Did GM or Pontiac change plating specs between 1970 and 71? I have a dented rear bumper, coded 8A25, consistent with it being original to my car, coded 09C. I have a nice "near NOS" bumper I bought years ago, maybe from someone here... it is straight, coded 2B22J. It is NOT a 70 bumper...is 71 or 72. When I set them side by side, I noticed a difference in the plating. The 70 looks darker, like more nickel. The other looks brighter, like more chrome. I think both are Pontiac parts, not repro, but I could be wrong if repros are date stamped. The 71/72 is more pitted. The 70 has held up better overall. When I searched online, my AI buddy said GM changed plating specs. Is this true? Here's the internet legend as I received it: 🔍 What Changed in GM Bumper Plating 1970 bumpers Typically had a heavier copper/nickel undercoat beneath the chrome.1971–72 bumpers GM began shifting contracts to different suppliers, especially as production volumes increased. |
So, your 8A25 bumper had no G (or other letter) at the end?
Interesting on the plating style differences. |
1 Attachment(s)
No letter, which I understand was a location or supplier code.
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1763652717 Car was built in Pontiac. Any insight into the plating difference? |
2 Attachment(s)
I just finished cleaning up the newer bumper I've been saving.
It had these stickers on it. Does this mean it was a replacement part from the counter and not from a factory-assembled car? https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1766876131 https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1766876173 The plating on it is definitely not as robust as what's on my original. |
I would say that is a service part. Looks like a shipping label in the 1st picture?
|
70 Bumper
Quote:
|
I have been told by many that service parts that were chromed were not as nice of a finish as the factory installed parts. Door handle are one example they gave. This was from someone who worked for Pontiac. But I really have no comparison other than some new inbox NOS parts I’ve seen that definitely were not that well chromed. That’s not a definitive answer I know but thought it may be helpful in some way.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I'm still curious about the plating differences and why it happened... Is it a location/supplier thing or was it an actual cost- or regulatory-driven change in plating spec? Would be cool to see the prints and engineering specs for these old parts! Mike |
Bumper
1 Attachment(s)
I attached the sticker that I have on my NOS bumper.
|
3 Attachment(s)
Thanks for posting the sticker.
Mine has the same PN 484946 but the stickers are different, suggesting they came from a different manufacturer or were made at different times: https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1766950590 As I understand, the 70 bumper is unique, with the 71 and 72 adding notches for bumper guards or something similar. The one on my car does not have notches and no stickers. I believe it to be original to the car, but that's just a guess: https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1766951272 The new one with the sticker has notches (and a different plating). So PN 484946 must have been a "universal" replacement for 70-72 even if different from an original 70, correct? https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...1&d=1766951246 |
My NOS bumper has the notches too.
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM. |