![]() |
Rear end ID help needed
All, I'm looking at a rear axle, and need help id'ing it.
Casting number is N 1235542. Stamping on the axle tube is JA G279 1 Wheel mounting surface width is 60". I have no info on perch to perch width. Looks to be an 8.5, but I am having trouble nailing down whether it is a Nova rear end, or a 2nd gen rear. Target vehicle would be my 67 Firebird, which is already running a Nova rear end with 3.73's. JA looks to be 2.73's, which would be a killer cruising gear. Any help appreciated, thanks! |
If your 3.73 rear is posi I bet the 8.5 2.73 is not if that matters to you?
|
No, this rear end is not posi. My 3.73 rear IS posi. Yeah, not ideal, but price is right.
Trying to get a perch center to center measurement. If a Nova rear, awesome. If 2nd gen, then I will likely skip it. A 2.73 would drop my cruise rpm on the highway by a good 1000. 3.73's are a blast, but not great for distance driving, and that's what I am looking more toward doing. |
That’s a big change in cruse rpm, where does your Cam’s power band start to haul nice?
|
Around 2000 rpm it starts to scream. It's a little bit cammed up for a 350. 10 years ago, chasing that extra .1 of E.T. was my rage. Not so much anymore
I looked under my car, and the casting on the pumpkin is a 1235542, from a 73 Nova IIRC. So at least that part matches. Is there a definitive way to tell by codes and stampings if an 8.5 is a Nova or 2nd gen rear? |
Find a camaro/nova site and see if they have the codes.
Some codes were just for camaro or just for nova. I'd have to search and see if I have them. :confused: |
Found this on the Nova site
Absolutely the most fool proof way. Stock 68-74 Nova 12-bolt/10-bolt rear axle width is... 60.25" wheel mounting face-to-wheel mounting face, including drum thickness 53.25" backing plate flange-to-backing plate flange 42.75" center-to-center on the leaf spring perches. |
There is no casting date on center section?
JA is usually a '73-4 Nova coded 2.73:1, non-posi. |
Quote:
Funny enough, I crawled under my ride, and found my current rear end is JA code, with similar dates. So it amounts to an almost identical rear to what I have, minus the posi and upgraded Currie axles. It's been a while since I built that setup. I'm gonna pass on it, let somebody else have a crack at it. Steve brings up a good point about power band. I would be probably better off seeking an OD trans in the future to get my cruise rpm's down. Thanks, all! |
From charts that I have the drop in rear wheel torque when going to 2.73 gears would be a big 27%, and all for a gain of about 10% in fuel mileage on level ground.
Like you posted, a trans swap would be the way to go. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM. |