View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-10-2004, 09:12 PM
Goat luver Goat luver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 79
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by red70goat:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ozzy:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by red70goat:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ozzyQUOTE]


Let me help you along here...... If there had been a 30 year gap between the '64 and the next GTO production model...
Answer: No.
Reason: Because automobiles are constantly evolving and using technology as it becomes available.

QUOTE]

You need to stick to the original question: 30 yr. gap between the 64 and 70, not as you have revamped the question of 64 and next production model. The 70 would have definately been recognizable as a GTO due to it's unique grill and stance, setting it apart from the rest of the Pontiac fleet. Had Rab. mentioned '74 I would have agreed with him because it was not unique in any way and was basically a rebadged model of something else already in mass production. While the 2004 certainly evolved technologically, aestically it had not evolved into anything recognizable other than what Pontiac was already producing in a fleet line. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Gee, for an Attorney you sure are having a difficult tme with this.
OK ....one more time. If there HAD been a 30 year gap between the 64 and the 70 would it have been instantly recognizable?
Answer: No, for the reasons previously stated.
__________________
Forgive them Lutz for they know not what they say
Reply With Quote