<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by judge_jury_executioner_69:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TheWho:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by red70goat:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by The Champ:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by red70goat:
Given the price of gas these days a torquin' 6 would probably go over quite well. If GM wants to save the GTO then a retro styled Goat with 2 engine options would appeal to the money conscience performance minded consumer. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Besides the fact that the price of gas has dropped by $.25 per gallon recently,(QUOTE]
How much is this war costing us again? And has the final bill been tallied ? And who is going foot the bill? But it doesn't really matter, given the direction Beavis and LutzHead are taking the GTO and the immense popularity of the 04/05 GM Monaro there will be no GTO in 2007. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That is by far the stupidest post I've seen on this forum, what the hell does the GOAT have to do with Bush's stupidity of going to war? God the only butthead here is you. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
no what you said was the stupidest thing i heared. we went to war to get rid of sadam and his weapons ( might not have found any but they did find things when combined would result in weapons ) kerry lost get over it. would you rather have waited another 5-10 years for him to have weapons and use them then go to kick his a**? if so everyone would say we should have got rid of him before he had weapons. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
To each his own opinion about war, I wasnt comparing going to war to the GTO though, keep that in mind before yapping your mouth.