<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TheWho:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by red70goat:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by The Champ:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by red70goat:
Given the price of gas these days a torquin' 6 would probably go over quite well. If GM wants to save the GTO then a retro styled Goat with 2 engine options would appeal to the money conscience performance minded consumer. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Besides the fact that the price of gas has dropped by $.25 per gallon recently,(QUOTE]
How much is this war costing us again? And has the final bill been tallied ? And who is going foot the bill? But it doesn't really matter, given the direction Beavis and LutzHead are taking the GTO and the immense popularity of the 04/05 GM Monaro there will be no GTO in 2007. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
what the hell does the GOAT have to do with Bush's stupidity of going to war? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Absolutely nothing. I was illustrating absurdety with absurdety. Champ and others like him constantly whine that all people do on this forum is "bash" the 2004 GTO. So, I submitted a few posts that were in no way derogatory, but suggested that Pontiac should consider retro styling and 2 engine options if they want to save the GTO. No matter what one says on this forum, unless you are totally behind GMs current attempt to revive the GTO then you know nothing about cars, you're an idiot, a troll, blah, blah, blah. Even the fact I've got a GTO which I've kept all factory right down to the lugnuts and it still runs well after 34 years and 278,000 miles apparantly unless you've got some sort of award that doesn't qualify you as a "car guy". According to Champ and others, I've got a beater, etc. If I was an 04 owner, I'd be heralded for keeping it in such an unmolested state. BTW Champ: Name me 1 post where I bagged on your 64, the Camaro, or your Caddy????