<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mr_GTO:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by judge_jury_executioner_69:
can you tell me what car the origional LT1 was put into? a camaro. who makes the slowmaro? you should know that the LT1 evolved into the LS1 which evolved into the LS2.
heres a link for ya
http://www.nastyz28.com/camaro/z28lt1.html ( slowmaro link )
heres another
http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicl.../70vette.frame ( corvette link )
i could go on and on but its obvious you cant admit that the LT1 is a "GM" engine.
heres a lonk for ya about the LS1
http://www.gm.com/company/racing/tec...orvetteC5R.htm
as you were saying....... <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You took the short bus to school right?
Again, SHOW ME WHERE A GM SITE SAYS THE LS1 iS A CHEVROLET MOTOR. THe C5R says the LS1 is a GM engine, not a CHEVROLET engine.
The old LT-1 is a Chevy. The last LT1 was BASED off the old SBC and it WAS a GM Powertrain motor also.
The new LS1/LS2 share NOTHING but bearings and bore spacing with the old SBC. It was a clean sheet of paper design.
Keep trying and try to become some what educated on the subject at hand. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
you did read the first paragraph right ? the one in bold ? before you said show me where it says the LT1/LS1/LS6/LS2 was a chevy motor. i did that with the LT1. now you say the LS1 isnt a chevy motor but a "GM" motor. the site says GM's family of LS1 overhead-valve V-8 engines can trace its roots to the fabled Chevrolet small-block V-8, yet the LS1 is much more than an offshoot from the small-block family tree. The LS1 continues the small-block's longstanding virtues of compact size, simplicity, reliability and high specific output. i can read between the lines here. yes the LS1 was a clean sheet of paper design. same with the "newer" LT1 or in other words the chevy 350 evolved into the LT1 which evolved into the LS1. who rode the short bus to school ?