<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Don Salisbury:
my answer to that is you can't compare the two ones an Pontiac and ones not, ones a 41 year old butt kicker with a history and track reccord and ones not , ones computer designed and ones not . But for a Pontiac motor that started the muscel car revolution and was in the dark ages as you guys make it seem . put one of your new ones up against ol man taylors 64 is it stock ? no but it shows what could have been done to the old iron and I'm sure he didn't even start to put the investment in that GM put in the SB ls8 that was originally designed for Corvette ah I think that wears a chevy badge. I guess if you relly want to compair apples for apples your going to have to take some of the old motors that have been built to todays standards and then line them up. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Oh...so you don't want to talk stock when it doesn't suit your argument.
BTW: Since the word "iron" was mentioned, care to take any guesses who built the first all aluminum (block, heads and pistons) OHV V8? I'll give you a hint: It was a 389. The engine wasn't a success because it didn't have sleeves. Nevertheless, whenever GM uses an aluminum block, heads and pistons in one engine they aren't getting that idea from chevrolet.
Finally, if you think you can't "build" a LS1/2 to surpass the levels of those "built" vintage Pontiac engines, you're mistaken.
|