Thread: GTO vs. LeMans!
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-24-2006, 03:04 PM
north's Avatar
north north is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,834
Default

I tend to agree that a 71-72 lemans is a cleaner looking car than the same years GTO that IMO had too much front overhang. And unlike the GTO's from that era, lemans' by not being thought of as performance cars in the first place, do not suffer from the stigma of being seen as smogger LoPos compared to there sixties counterparts.
Thats not to say that those GTO's are not nice cars (or that 455ho's were not good engines), it's just that when a car that was marketed to be all about horsepower finds itself (in 71) with 50 less hp and even it's top performance engine has 15 hp less than the base engine of previous year it's hard not to take a hit to the reputation and gotta have it departments (not to mention the then new and even lower sounding net numbers). the sales, or lack of, in that era clearly reflected this problem.

__________________
My Break Away Squad
1969 Fbird (base OHC, 350, 400HO & Sprint Cvt’s - 400HO & TA ht’s)
1969 Custom S 2dr ht
1969 LeMans (2dr & 4dr ht & Cvt)
1969 LeMans Safari wagon
1969 GTO (2 Cvt, 2 ht & Judge ht)
1969 Cat (3 Cvt’s & a 2dr ht)
1969 Ventura wagon 2 seat
1969 Exec 4dr post
1969 2 Bonnie Cvt's & 2 wagons
1969 Bonnie Brougham (4dr ht & Cvt)
1969 Grand Prix 2 SJ’s
1969 2+2 2dr ht (Canadian)