View Single Post
  #15  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:12 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,616
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C.
Ok between the two, and setting aside the minimal differance in air flow.

One set-up with a little deeper chamber and flat top piston, with no dish and only valve reliefs, for 10.5 compression. And the second with a little shallower chamber and a piston with a 20cc dish for the same 10.5 compression.

Is there any flame front and/or burn pattern issues with the deeper 20cc dished piston compared to the flat top piston ?

I was told by a friend about a discussion years ago with Jim Butler and at the time Jim favored a flat top. This came during a discussion about milling out a dish on a TRW piston to make them pump gas friendly with a small chamber iron head.
From what I've read, putting as much of the combustion chamber as you can in the piston itself is beneficial.

Aren't some of the best engine builders using heads with a tiny or even close to no combustion chamber along with a properly shaped dish in the piston these days?

I know this is the street forum, but wouldn't it be a good idea to mimic this type of build on a street engine if the additional cost for a properly dished piston is somewhat minimal in comparison to the rest of the build? That's all I'm getting at.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/3.08
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
1966 VW Type 2 Single Cab Pickup 140hp 2276
1956 VW Type 2 Panel Van 36hp 1200
1957 VW Type 1 Beetle 180hp 2276