View Single Post
  #229  
Old 10-28-2007, 12:36 PM
Baron Von Zeppelin Baron Von Zeppelin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cammer-6
Only if you ordered the Protection group 322 was the shoulder belts a no cost item.
hmm...I'll have to disagree in certain respects. I suppose you are only referencing belts in a Bird, hopefully and perhaps.

The BHC/Label Price dissection/Option Call Out sheets/Window Sticker verify otherwise on the GTO's.

ramair2's Bird call out sheets (highlighted order forms) list no charge or mention for shoulder belts either. Maybe it's a fluke, or maybe there is a break point.

Perhaps you can actually post some actual factory documentation, as in post your BHC for these Cars and I will dissect them. I do believe shoulder belts in hardtops "may" have been a charge in earlier built Cars. But not in any of these we have done so far. I stand to be corrected as far as Birds go, and welcome your BHC's. It may educate us further.

I read the arrangement in a totally different manner. And feel completely 100% confident about it concerning GTO's - at the least. The label price totals, PHS highlighted order forms and even the original window sticker we have from the Black RA1 GTO confirm Brians' and my science in use.

Please show me where the charge for the #754 option from the BHC is listed on this original window sticker (from same Car). It is obvious it has shoulder belts by the #754 on BHC and the 12.34 charge for upgrade to custom/deluxe belts. Where is the #754 front shoulder belt charge.

BlkBrd's Pre-January hardtop lists no 754. That may have been near a break point. I'd really rather see it in the actual math of a post-February built Car.

I realize the fact that we are dealing with two different type vehicles in this thread could easily cause confusion to some readers in some regards. Lets be specific and show all proofs, and state when something you are discussing is only related to one or the other - or both. It may be by accident, but you're clouding the issues.

Let me stress, I don't mind being corrected - but lets see the actual pertinent factory generated documentation from a post-February built Firebird first.

The post-February GTO is cut and dry, already.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	68 GTO BlkBlk  RA1.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	24.4 KB
ID:	109422   Click image for larger version

Name:	68 GTO RA1 BlkBlkB.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	48.7 KB
ID:	109423