Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris Roach
Your comparison on the grade 3 bolts in rods is not a good one. Call the bolt manufacturer and they will tell you at what point that bolt will fail. It’s a proven and documented fact.
Call any aftermarket block manufacture and ask them at what performance level their block will fail? I’m guessing you won’t get much of an answer. Which is the point I'm trying to get accross.
All points in this discussion have been good points, but still no proven facts on when a block will fail, based on what we discussed.
We all know now that we’d prefer a block with a harder brinell. But, prior to the whole MR1 deal, how many even knew what brinell was or even took into consideration the actual hardness of a block. Not many I’m sure.
|
I think the whole point of 'this post' is that (And correct me if I'm wrong)
#1: The case is going to be tried in Ohio not Virginia. Which is what was contested and tried to be thrown out?
#2: That the block received was delivered to a customer below standards advertised at that time claimed by the consumer?
#3: That work done after receiving the block never affected the integrity of the block as claimed by the other party?
#4: That at the time all consumer wanted was the block replaced or refunded because block did not meet standards posted by the seller?
#5: Seller claims in court documents that work done affected the initial integrity of the block and all claims are null and void?
Any of this wrong?