View Single Post
  #348  
Old 05-15-2008, 03:41 PM
PONTIAC DUDE's Avatar
PONTIAC DUDE PONTIAC DUDE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 14,756
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker
Actually John, it is part of the case. Read paragraphs 5 and 19 of the latest court decision:

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/do...-ohio-1922.pdf

Be patient, this page takes a bit to download.

Someone explain this to me in Laymans terms. I'm confused????? Thanks.

Quote:
Paragraph 5: Kauffman Racing contacted Roberts, inquiring as to whom had undertaken the modifications of the engine block. Roberts admitted Central Virginia Machine had worked on the part. Kauffman Racing advised Roberts it would not buy back the engine block as the defects of which he complained were the result of modifications made subsequent to the sale and delivery of the part, and not by the manufacturer of the block itself.
So the complaint with the block was ?????????????????????