"Funny how the N/A internal combustion V-8 engine shows so many similarities following a few basic guidelines for setting them up, no matter what brand they are........Cliff"
In the article BruceWilkie linked to earlier (post #45), the author uses two examples of good vs. poor (for CR purposes) combustion chamber design, the Cadillac Northstar and the Hemi. I recall him saying the 2000 Caddy redesign allowed them to get up to 10-1 SCR on 87 octane (the second example I know of in this thread after LT1s.)
So it appears those more modern chambers that everyone begged Edelbrock for (in Pontiac heads) are also a big part of that ideal combo. Now we even have them coming into the market for the masses.
--so, I'll try a brief recap, as the thread grows, of responses to the original question:
I. Major factors/variables beyond SCR include:
-Dynamic compression ratio /cranking compression (as determined by cam events like LSA and IC--NOT overlap as is often assumed)
-RPM range the engine operates in (determined by gearing and driving purpose)
-Quench distance (pistons down the cylinder)
-head material (iron vs aluminum)
-cooling system efficiency
-fuel quality, in addition to octane
-combustion chamber design
I'm sure I missed some--did it from memory.
II. The major points of contention seem to be:
-Should a "safe" SCR (8-1? 9-1?) be observed by non-tuners, even those who read these forums and are trying to learn more about high performance? Is SCR even useful as a guideline, given the many other variables?
-Should camshaft LSA be wide or tight for a Pontiac, and for what purpose (part-throttle cruising? drag racing? dual-purpose? remembering that this is the "Street" section)?
-What is the useful limit of dynomometer data for street-perf vehicles?
I'll be happy to edit omissions/inaccuracies if they're pointed out.
Last edited by mechanic17; 02-17-2011 at 04:59 PM.
|