If her chosen profession was say an MD and she was as good at that as she is at racing, and had one correct diagnosis and saved one persons life in 16 years. Say she prolonged a few peoples lives a little longer than if she hadn't treated them. Maybe twice we thought the people were going to pull through but in the final minutes in surgery she choked and lost them, then how many people here would go to her?
The hospital she worked for promoted the heck out of her and got some people believing she was going to perform way better surgery than the other doctors, but after 3 years the mortality rate of her patients was much worse than the hospital ever anticipated, and out of 43 doctors she was rated 30th but with some practice over the next 2-3 years she may move her position from 30th to say 25th. Who's going to let her practice on them after the word gets out that she ain't what all the hype generated by the hospital and media said she'd be. The employer looks at hiring her as a liability and the media is just about quit talking about her completely and don't pick up stories about her like they used to.
It's all in the way you look at a persons job performance, that puts it in perspective. Anyone here want to let her practice on them for a surgery? Is close enough okay when it come to job performance?
Some people just aren't cut out to do the job they're doing, when your job performance is that poor after a good while on the job, you might just be in the wrong line of work. The touring queen is in the wrong line of work. Maybe she'd be better suited to being a politician, blaming someone else for her job performance comes pretty natural to her. And doing a poor job year after year seems to be considered fine in the political world, After King Obuma, should we have Queen Patrick, 4 more years...........................
