View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-19-2013, 10:00 PM
Bnick166's Avatar
Bnick166 Bnick166 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike leech View Post
I did not buy them untill 2002. improved them twice. put to sleep in 2005 fall. The first time I John m attempted porting them with a shaft rocker, .400 offset it made 883 in 2004 at 488 cu in.



YOUR POINT?
My point is you didn't buy them until 2002....but they were released in 1995. So, theoretically...the heads were out for 7 years before YOU got them to perform at that level....correct?
Conversely....it took you a very short time to make your mark w/ the pro ports. A great head shows results...and "fast" you say. Look at the time span between when the RPM's were 1st released and the time it took to put a N/A street car into the 7's.
You should have the Pro ports in the 7's this year...assumably. That makes the pro ports WAYYYY better than the RPM's..right? Just tryin' to get a handle on the logic that is being used.
They (RPM's) were out for 17 years before Jack got them to perform at the level that HE is at. I haven't followed the dates on Jeff's milestones....but it hasn't happened overnight....more like YEARS. Many years since the RPM's were released. Just tired of hearin' how the CV-1 have been out for SOOO long. Not really that long in the grand scheme of things. A few have hyped the cv-1's up and regretably...too soon. My CV-1 engine made 705 hp and I spec'd everything but the cam. I'm a truck mechanic by trade. I can weld, paint, wire and just about anything else when I put my mind to it. I'm not an engine building specialist by any means....but 700 hp on pump gas is fine by me...for now.