Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss
Mike,
Thank you for your reply. It shows your clear ignorance of the laws of physics and the relationship between between HP, RPM and torque. Also stop swinging from Jack's balls and put away your clear CV-1 BS. While I did not do the Photoragphy, they did have my name so it could be listed in the article. I have no head preference, but I post up a response when people like you post up BS about someone's product.
Stan
|
You sir are lost on the reality of the topic. If you truly believe its the same you are lost on practical application of physics. Matters not how great you are at designing simulators. I understand all about how the horsepower is calculated and torque is measured. You aren't the only one with an engineering background. The NUMBER is the same, not the usable power when applied over seconds of the engine running and doing work. If your point is valid then why do all engine builders in corporate a higher rpm into their engine designs when trying to improve or maximize et potential in a vehicle? So they can spend more money and increase the work load on parts only to achieve the same results. I'm not ignorant of physics at all Stan, but if you think that saying that makes it so then I understand why you think what you do about this any many other subjects.
As far as swinging from jack. I do t think anybody does that. I think jacks upgrades will take some trial and error to achieve the results he expects. And I'm not and never have bashed a product.... Just the nut swingers that all jump on the band wagon for emotional reasons. Sorry you fit right in with the group. Feel free to help an na car of similar weight and your beloved c 1 wool my a$$. I'll accept defeat with grace.
__________________
EHTTFMF!
Being dead, it is not hard on you. You don't even know you're dead. It is hard on everyone else that is not dead.
BEING STUPID WORKS THE SAME WAY! The rest of us suffer.