Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Eveland
Harry, any speculation of testing if you would have used a qjet on the oe manifold than used an adapter to mount it to the square bore intake? Thanks
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry k
cfm is cfm, whatever cfm you elect to use @ WOT not matter what carb it is or has been used, the power outcome@peak rpm will be the same.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry k
usually i don't rationalise with someone uses the name "WHORE"
but i ll make it clear in this case
keyword here "acording to the parts you use" yes i used high rise aluminum intake manifold which benifited the engine.NOT A MODIFIED CAST IRON INTAKE MANIFOLD THAT REQUIRES TO RUN Q-JET AND ASSOCIATED FUEL DELIVERY SYSTEM TO SUPPLEMENT A SMALL BOWL CARB THAT NEEDS ALL THE HELP IN THE WORLD TO MAKE THEM WORK TO SIMPLY MEET A HOLLEY OR EDELBROCK CARB PERFORMANCE!!!!
|
Bill asked a question pertaining to two
different combos and your respomce was that it did not matter, that they would both have the same power outcome. Really
Let me ask you this, why did your high rise manifold make more power over the stock intake? Could it have anything to do with airflow? More cfm? A better match of parts? By your logic there should have
not been any difference in power.
I realise that you can swap parts with no power gains but the whole point of this thread was to show that there was a gain.
And by the way, how often do you get the chance to rationalize with someone that has Whore in there name
