View Single Post
  #9  
Old 12-29-2013, 12:46 PM
harry k's Avatar
harry k harry k is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: van nuys,california,91401
Posts: 2,053
Send a message via AIM to harry k Send a message via MSN to harry k Send a message via Yahoo to harry k
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Eveland View Post
The whole point of your thread was to show the power increase in an "apples to apples" test by your standards by switching intake manifolds. Now how can it not be by using a differant carb for testing and flipping around the scenario with the spacers and still swapping out intakes? Maybe that can be round #3 .

Bill
I can easily get the customer back in and remove the E carb and throw a Q-jet on and test it or remove the high rise intake install cast iron pos intake back on and install Q-jet if you are curious what would the results will be for round #3 if that what you're implying, BUT the main thing would be here is the critiques will still cry at this point further again cause the Q-jet isnt built to a one book standards......OR and create further critisim in any nature.

Rest assured that i will post something else further down the road as has been very appreciated by most forum members for my time & testing and we"ll see if history does't repeats itself.

__________________
someone who thinks logically is a nice contrast to the real world.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FfKVVZW1-Y

Last edited by harry k; 12-29-2013 at 12:53 PM.