Bruce you have no reason to speculate postulate or ruminate on my decision. Fwiw, I thank you again for your previous help.
now as you have brought it up. The under cammed, 70 cfm less.hi ports ran within .1 of the cvs. I DID the test for my own knowledge. I Paid ALL the expenses. The gentleman that wanted my motor, wanted the cvs. I gave the choice. He received a strong powerful motor. He would have received the same powerful I motor if he wanted the hi port package. I PROVED both were capable.
My reasons for selling are my own. I OWNED them and accomplished something to my knowledge unduplicated by any other cv car. Mjm has a great ride but.he had marcella in those ports.
You Bruce, are a great friend and champion for your friends and the cv head. However your fervor borders on unsubstantiated faith rather than proven facts. You and the 'others' did Jim no benefit.
I was never embarrassed with my results, I was appalled I was being associated with a circus side show. I removed myself.from the fray, at a large finacial cost to make the change.
How invested are you? Understand you have your issues, so does everyone. You make your decisions I'll make mine.
__________________
1968 firebird cameo white on red 400 4 speed
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed
1964 gto pump gas, 505 IA2 EHeads, EFI, 92 mm turbo ice cream getter in process now....
1970 lemans hardtop, gto clone Atoll Blue
1972 Maverick powered by 2004 gto ls1 and t56 6 speed, 8.8, fox strut front end, wifes car
|