View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-13-2014, 07:23 PM
mike leech's Avatar
mike leech mike leech is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgeise View Post
While those are benchmark numbers I think its more important to look at HP per cid to see a heads potential -- 1100 out of 500 ci is way more impressive than 1200 out of 600 plus ci if you do the math. So -- if a cv head makes 1000 on a 572 is it as good as a e-head on say a 540 that makes 1000 ??? close but no,
good point. If i have my way the 572 cv1 and the 540 ehead will duke it out at norwalk. The only problem is if the 572 doesn't go fast enough to win for SURE it won't show at all. Mark it down even if the 572 makes 1150-1200 I WILL RACE THE CAMARO ANYWAY!

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.C.you View Post
lol.....and so says someone that has never made any power N/A with a pontiac....you are starting to sound like Stan.
he has more than 1 car....mouth<foot

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOGEORGE View Post
Curt,
It's the round after round after round thing
that's confusing some racers. They Just don't understand, it's a new concept to them! LOL!


GTO George
George you don't get that either. You are constantly referring to these type engines as one hit wonders. I guarantee I make double the passes you do in a year. Same valve springs all year. Chris uratchko thinks theres a bunch more power with a more aggressive cam/rocker ratio. I like the reliability more....its not on kill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.C.you View Post
Any dyno sheet of your claimed 1000hp motor? Weight and all out ets, in what type aero body? I smell some BS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiL Jack View Post
Nice 1009 HP @ 7,000 RPM!

Probably easy on valve train with that low rpm.
oops! Nice build!

__________________
EHTTFMF!


Being dead, it is not hard on you. You don't even know you're dead. It is hard on everyone else that is not dead.
BEING STUPID WORKS THE SAME WAY! The rest of us suffer.

Last edited by mike leech; 02-13-2014 at 07:31 PM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mike leech For This Useful Post: