View Single Post
  #9  
Old 03-17-2014, 10:25 PM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dci View Post
Scott, I could not find any info on anyone other than Steinbreck using a tunnel port head for Prostock. I did find some info on a 351 Ford with what they called a split port tunnel port design head. Kind of like what I have done with my heads. The guy claims it made 1023 HP. I could not find much more about it, except he claims it was outlawed because it gave the Ford boys an unfair advantage in Nascar. The heads were actually a Ford part in their motorsports catalog as recently as 1996. I know Tom V made mention of them, but other than that I could not find anything else about them. Does anyone know who the guy was that worked on this program for Junior Johnson? If so, I would love to get the guys number or email.
Don,

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic...&sid=0a1051f0c

See posts:

Darin Morgan » Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:41 pm

"The only tunnel port head I had anything to do with was that piece of crap Ford came out with because Junior Johnson though it would be a good idea. All I did was port it and flow it and tell them it would never work because the wet flow was total junk."

-------

This one is pretty interesting as well!

Darin Morgan » Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:39 pm

"I dont mean to be overly critical but this guy is living in Disney land if he thinks that thing will come close to 2.25hp/cid much less 2.6 or 2.7. Thats just plane silly! "

------LMAO

Then Lynn replies:
CMI Motorsports » Tue Jul 04, 2006

"I agree that Pontiacs do not have the capability now or in the near future of making 2.5 or greater HP per cubic inch. Sorry if one of my posts suggested that, but it was probably one post taken out of context with many other posts and threads. "

--------------------------

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/....php?p=4687111

More delirium! July 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHRASuperStock455SD View Post
With our existing ports 2.7 for this engine is very capable, we must work very hard to get 2.9. We will post this project as it happens.
------------------

Where I am from, when we say we will do something, we DO IT!
Stop the BS.