View Single Post
  #238  
Old 01-13-2015, 09:46 AM
LMSRACER's Avatar
LMSRACER LMSRACER is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hampton, VA.
Posts: 436
Default Let Me Elaborate a Little.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LMSRACER View Post
What I've found is that finding a Block that can go over 4.200" is kinda' rare. Unless you want Bores that are less than 0.095" in Thickness. I try to stay above 0.100" in "Non Thrust" Areas of the Bore and above 0.150" in the Thrust Areas. If you're Racing, then "Hard Block" is Your Friend.

Have a Good One,
Larry S.
In this Post that I had made previously, I want to Clarify what I said.

While rereading My Posts last night I realized that this information may be a little misleading.

I PREFER to have a minimum of 0.125" of Wall Thickness on the "Non Thrust" (Front and Rear) Portions/Surfaces of the Cylinder Bore and a minimum of 0.185" on the "Piston Skirt Loaded" (Inner and Outer) Portions/Surfaces (Not just the Thrust Surface) of the Cylinder Bores as a MINIMUM.

That's what I PREFER. BUT, what I have found over the years is that I have had a lot of trouble finding Blocks that could be Overbored more than 0.030" with that much Wall Thickness Remaining. So, because of that, I've had to adjust what I would accept as a "BARE MINIMUM". That's where the previous specs. of 0.100" and 0.150" came from.

I hope that makes more sense,
Larry S.

__________________
----------
http://www.pas4performance.com
Proud to Say, "Made in the USA"
----------