[AdamIsAdam]

HWYSTR455,
Thanks for taking the time to write this all out. I'll answer your questions below:

Originally Posted by HWYSTR455

IF, if you are suffering cooling issues, and nothing you do seems to correct them, then checking the clearance is one step in troubleshooting the issue. In this case though, it was running cooler before a change was made, so IMO, the pump clearance isn't the problem here. If it were, it would be hot all the time. Just trying to approach this logically.

That's why I was saying I didn't want to start looking outside of my changes, but people suggested to cover my bases. Not a bad idea. My temps weren't great before, as they did wander a bit, but never when it was cool out and NEVER did it run at 210 on the highway. Highway was not an issue before at all IIRC.

Another thing, running an electric fan over like 50 mph does nothing for cooling, and it can block more flow than not running.

I wondered about this and where that crossover point is as well. But then again, nothing changed on this from before. Either way, I'll try switching the fan off on the highway when the temps rise and see if that helps.

"I changed from a Holley DP to a brand new Cliff Ruggles Qjet and also started messing with vacuum advance. This started sending my engine temps soaring and my oil pressure plummeting. "

Ok, engine water temps do effect oil temps, which in turn does effect oil psi. But. There are still times where oil temps are going to rise, like extended periods on the highway. And unless there are other factors, oil temps will eventually be in a 'range' while in operation, and it shouldn't be enough to drastically effect oil psi. My understanding there was a gauge issue that caused the oil psi inconsistencies in the other post, but I would have to go back and reread, memory isn't serving me as well as it used to!

Yes, the electric gauge was less accurate than the new mechanical one. It was almost exaggerating the swings. But I'm still having basically same symptoms. I do like the new gauge's wider sweep area so I can more accurately see the PSI.

A real quick comment when it comes to carbs. You can't have someone 'setup' your carb to your engine's exact 'specs' and expect it to work perfectly the moment you bolt it on. That's not how it works. It can be very close, but it's ALWAYS going to need minor adjustments, there's just too many variables.

Understood and agreed. I just didn't want to make big changes in error and then introduce more variables.

So what does this leave? What has changed that made a difference in your cooling concerns? Timing.

" I can't hot-start the car with more than 14* initial even with my mini starter without lots of kickback."

Ok first if your mini starter doesn't turn that engine over at like 14 or 16 degrees of initial timing and it's dragging or kicking back, you have electric issues or a bad starter. Check the cables, connectors, load test the battery, etc, go over the starter system and make sure everything is up to par. Crappy battery cables or a crappy battery is my guess on your setup, sounds like you would have taken care of anything else in that system, have pretty good attention to detail. Put a remote sol on it too which is a good idea anyway. You definitely have a hot start problem in the starter system.

It's been much better ever since I've kept the battery tender on it more often. I'll double check these issues though. At 14* it's not a problem to start now.

Usually, when you throw more timing at an engine at idle, the idle speed goes up, meaning you have to adjust idle speed. I haven't heard you comment on any changes to idle speed being made through all these changes, are you making any? And also, going up 100 rpm isn't a bad thing, and can also help some with idle temps. Most of my cars idle at 900-950 to give you an idea. How are you checking rpm? (since it came up)

Yes, the idle has been going up/down with timing as one would expect. I have been adjusting/compensating for it which is why the initial timing was taken at the same 700 RPM listed below. I'll try raising that a bit. Before I had it at around 850-900.

I'm still not clear on whether or not the numbers you're getting with your light are right, still sounds like something is askew. I noticed you don't have an HEI module in the dizzy, so guess you're running an MSD or similar box? You know some timing lights don't work right with some boxes, right? Maybe take a pic of your timing marks too. On the timing cover. Tell us what kind of box you have, and the settings on the box.

I have an MSD 6AL box. I don't know how it's set up. I did read that some timing lights don't play well with MSD, but my two both seem to work, as did the one Richie used. What would it show if it wasn't working, what would I see?

What I suspect more, based on the fact that my timing curve numbers vary a bit, is that something in my advance is varying a bit and/or my eyes vary a bit. I have an aftermarket balancer with timing marks to 50* reading against a stock cover. I often find that the timing seems to vary by 1 or even 2* depending on my angle. I try to be consistent with where I'm standing when I read it, but it does seem to vary.

For example, here are two sets of measurements (no vacuum advance added):
Initial 14 @ 700 RPM, then
22 @ 1,500
30 @ 2,000
36 @ 3,500

Initial 10 @ 700 RPM, then
20 @ 1,500
27 @ 2,000
35 @ 3,500

When I removed 4* of initial, shouldn't I see a linear 4* drop all along they way?


I'm measuring RPM with an old Sears Engine Analyzer like this one:




Misc Pics:



Balancer (from below):