
07-04-2015, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Ultimate Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 7,441
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceWilkie
Fultons combo is NOT unlimited budget! More money than a street strip car? Sure, but no way unlimited budget.
NEVER said it was!
At what weight and CI is this Buick? Is it NA? How is this relevant to a Pontiac discussion?
It's irrelevant, so I don't know why you would ask.
Do you specialize in port development or are you just another machinist with a die grinder porting heads and intakes?
We specialized in head porting until we started building complete engines about twelve years ago. Now we specialize in both!
I'm honest enough to say even I can make improvements with a die grinder and sand rolls but NO WAY am I a head porter nor am I claiming I could out do your work.
Please start a thread telling us about all your accomplishments.
1100 HP NA Pontiac as a nitrous build(with the n2o off) compared against an NA Pontiac build with same ci or larger with over 3 points more compression is splitting hairs??? Really??? Cam timing events totally unfavorable to optimum NA requirements, manifolding, headers etc.. Really???
It seems like you are making the comparisons.
Just maybe you ought to find out who else uses the dyno Dick uses. Maybe you want to find out who witnessed results. Maybe find out what Dicks track reults were with his E-heads compared to numbers from same dyno. Others results from same dyno.
Why, is there something wrong with the calibration?
Its OK for you to tell us a dyno number, but somehow anything from the CV camp is a lie?
I never doubted ANY dyno numbers.
Dont get me wrong, not diminishing anyones Pontiac 1100+ hp NA build(not many regardless of head choice and they benefit all of us eventually), nor am I out to diminish your customers results.
I don't care.
I do however look at what an entire build is and judge it accordingly. They are all the sum of what they are.
You should be open minded.
To suggest nearly 4 points compression and same or greater cubes at higher rpm is "splitting hairs" is about as misleading as it gets.
I stand by my original statement "all the builds are winners".
Its as if you are assuming the average reader in this forum isnt smart enough to see the difference or know that a power adder motor is a completely different build than an NA combo
I don't have time to assume what other people think.
|
I hope this helps.
Last edited by PAUL K; 07-04-2015 at 02:29 PM.
|