View Single Post
  #35  
Old 10-18-2015, 12:19 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobalong View Post
Just as thought as I read this thread.
The previous owner of my 70 GTO installed the RAlll exhaust manifolds. In addition he installed the tube that the battery cable passes thru.
It leads the + pos cable right between the hot cast iron manifold tubes on the drivers side down to the starter.
Now I pride myself on having a pretty factory stock looking car. Not 100% mind you but pretty close. In 08 during the first engine rebuild I eliminated that tube. I'm sure the Pontiac engineers had their reason for that cable route, but it just defied common sense to put an unfused, heavy cable right in harms way.
I bought a longer red cable and routed it down the front of the engine and then back to the starter. Is it factory correct ? NOPE. Out of harms way and I no longer worry about a melt down, short circuit, or catastrophic under hood fire.
I did the 67 RA manifold Battery Cable routing on my 64 when I installed the Manifolds on the engine.

1) The Pontiac Engineers did the Battery Cable routing change for a reason.

2) I emulated what they did.

3) I was able to use 1/0 AWG Tinned Copper Marine Terminals. (Copper die casting tinned battery terminals resist corrosion and are superior in Marine environments. They have high amperage flow for optimum performance.)

4) I heated the terminals, added the proper solder, and no issues for many, many years (with a touch up on the battery terminal and cable end with the proper wire brush battery terminal/post cleaning tool).

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.