View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-06-2015, 03:18 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtofreek View Post
...
Not turning this into a FT/roller cam debate[I don't care either way, as I use both], just saying that both types can have issues. Some people think that just because they go to roller cam setup, that it will completely eliminate any cam/lifter related issues they might have. I'm just saying, not necessarily.
Absolutely. There are plenty of instances of roller cam failures out there. Like I said, these are aftermarket parts built for a retrofit application, not OEM designed from the ground up.

Thing is, when a roller goes bad the failure can often be catastrophic - breaking lifter bores & such. Usually you catch a flat tappet going bad because it starts making noise. Yeah, you get some metal through the engine but if you catch it quick enough this usually isn't catastrophic and you might not need to do anything other than replace cam & lifters. Break a lifter bore and the block is done vs. maybe new bearings and a re-hone.

That said, I like the performance advantage of rollers and would always choose one if the budget allows. As mentioned above, no reason you can't run a mild roller that produces a stock type idle and doesn't require really high spring pressures and it'll still make more power than a stock cam.

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.