
04-18-2016, 12:42 PM
|
 |
Ultimate Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,561
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'ol Pinion head
AG, as far as "heavy duty" goes, would bet you have also noted that when Pontiac billed out a HD Safe-T-Track on an invoice it did so at at a higher price than regular Safe-T-Track. Only instances I've ever read with this higher charge is when a 3.90 or 4.33 HD Safe-T-Track rearend was optioned. Those instances were the only cases in an A Body or F- body that the rearend was built with the HD forged axles. The combination of forged axles, nodular iron 8.2 center housing, 4 pinion HD Safe-T-Track carrier, and either 3.90 or 4.33 gearing wiill be the only time one will see the designation HD Safe-T-Track in a vehicle with a Pontiac 8.2 rearend. Lacking all the attributes, the 8.2 Pontiac rear just isn't HD, one can call it standard duty, medium duty, or even light duty.
Your GP rear should have a 4 pinion carrier. the flat spots on the 69 GP housing tubes, am sure you have also seen them on '69 Firebird axle tubes as well.
of note to Mark's last post, I've yet to run a across a tapered bearing end housing in a factory assembled '69 A body housing built before July of '69. The extremely late (08A) Arlington '69 gold LeMans I parted many years ago, had its original sealed axle bearing rearend. From dealings with '69 Firebird guys, it seems to be Firebird housings got the tapered bearing hsgs a little earlier, and may be a good reason why master parts books use the confusing terminology early '69 and late '69 production when denoting the Pontiac 8.2 axles and ring & pinions.
|
Correct, but the question posed by the OP was about the carrier, not what constitutes a HD Safe-T-Track rear end.
__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/ [email protected]" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. [email protected] mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
|