[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceWilkie
Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.
/QUOTE]
Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?
What question did I deflect?
|
Lets start here and get back to that^^^...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010
Quote:
|
Some people in this thread jump to conclusions.... also some perfer to make their own facts up.
|
I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013
Quote:
|
Who?? Name names so we know who you are talking about.
|
Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026
Quote:
TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor. 
|
I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034
Quote:
So who lost power over previous heads Paul? Do tell.
BTW you deserve a point of credit this time...at least you dropped a name.
|
Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038
Quote:
|
Please reread my post....then explain what you are asking.
|
My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091
Quote:
Re-read your own post. It implies Bill makes things up and his heads have not shown improvement over others previous heads.
My reply was simply asking you to point out where there hasnt been improvement.
I didnt ask you to deflect the question.
Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.
If you want to criticize Bills work show him how its done then.
Get a work piece, set and agree on targets, and find a neutral party to test against each others work.
Doesnt have to be a CV head...maybe someone has a damaged unported E-head (or other)that could be cut to be a work piece for both of you.
* I probably should have discussed this with Bill but I think he'd accept the challenge.
|
pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092
Quote:
|
There you go jumping to conclusions and getting all butt hurt over your own words, again.
|
paul additionaly says...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceWilkie
Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.
/QUOTE]
Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?
What question did I deflect?
|
For saying "you" I guess that means me...close enough to a name... you get another credit.
SO now im making up facts? Please share with everyone what "facts" I've made up! This should be interesting. Be sure to provide reference and dont forget any I acknowledge when I've got something wrong.
As to the questions you deflected... See posts 1013 1026 and 1034
The questions asked in those 3 posts.
All here in one post to save you from jumping page to page.
Seems like you're taking lessons from Gach and hoping you can cloud your posts till they get buried in new posts. Maybe he'll give you a good report card and a sticker.
