[mike leech]

Originally Posted by Jeff Kinsler

So there's 25 to 30 hp that the e heads didn't have on it. So the 7.7s could have been 7.6s?

Not that I've seen

Originally Posted by mjm421

I don't know Jeff. I don't think you'd see 25 or 30 over a good wet sump and pump. Could be wrong though.

Good wet sump with a enhanced 4 vane pump is probably equal to drysump

Originally Posted by Anderson Port Development

... so how much Faster was Leech's car after he installed his Auto-Verdi ?? ...

None. We now have 10 qts and 5 stages of oil removal. 0 oil issues but no more power.

Originally Posted by Jeff Kinsler

Ask him

He did.

Originally Posted by john marcella

Dry sumps made hp vs wet sumps because they make vacuum too. Now we put vacuum pumps on so not much there but better oiling after that. Some systems may be better down track do to better oil control. Imo.

Bingo!

Originally Posted by TimeWarp

You know...if you created something you'd be excited about it too. That doesn't make it a holy grail. Every time the EHTTFMF guys come on here posting "EHTTFMF!!!", or you for example several posts ago.......you'd think E-heads were the holy grail.

But that doesn't seem to get the same knock as when Bill talks about something he created. And Bill wasn't the one posting "CV1TTFMF!!!"

Who exactly ARE the cheerleaders? And which heads are the "Holy Grail" exactly?

Seems to me its been the E-heads.

You need to lay by your bowl and lick your sore butt a while before going back on the porch barking at everyone.