[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Anderson Port Development

... Hey Stan, can you tell me what you come up with using this last projection you posted, but change the MPH @ 1/8th to 149.8 and tell me what that change will look like to rest of the run please ??

Bill,
The difference between the two simulations that I posted above was to just not remove as much power down low to improve the 60 foot times.

If I adjust so that the 60 foot time stays the same as that run while adding some power later in the run.

60 Foot ET = 1.1167
330 Foot ET = 3.0251
1/8 Mile ET = 4.6581
1/8 Mile MPH = 149.8362
1000 Foot ET = 6.0810
1/4 Mile ET = 7.2908
1/4 Mile MPH = 186.8020

I have no idea how what I have setup in this simulation matches your car setup. This simulation uses 2.1:1 1.4:1 1.0:1. The last time I had time to play around and try to simulate your runs at Norwalk I was using a 1.9:1 first witch seemed to get a better match up. - 2.439 0.9925

Stan