View Single Post
  #19  
Old 07-02-2018, 06:56 PM
TedRamAirII TedRamAirII is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pronto Poncho View Post
As it turns out I don’t believe the rocker arms were ever a problem. They were replaced as an attempted to address the problem. I can’t help but worry if something is going on with the geometry of the valve train. As much as I hate the thought of the extra work it may be a good idea to go ahead take off the intake and valley pan and take a look at those lifters.

One question keeps going over in my mind. If Paul has done a number of these engine builds and all have been done using the same combination of parts with no problems what was different that would cause this problem? The Valley pan was a simple mistake that could be made by anyone of us. But here is the big question. If all the same parts were used that were used on an all these other successful builds. Then it can only be one of two things, a component failure or error made during the build. The hard part now is finding out which it is.
I dont think the rockers were a problem, but they were replaced. I would think the pushrods would be examined as well, I mean...... you are right there. I was just looking at the tops of the poly locks and noticed different heights, they should be pretty uniform. So its either a lot of bad/bent pushrods or the valve adjustment is way off, or there are lifter issues. Look at #2 intake and exh rocker set screws, they are way different ! #4 int, #6 exh, #8 int all set screws are down low, like they are set loose? I just hate the motor to be pulled and shipped for it to it end up something simple!

__________________
1968 Firebird 400 RAII M21, 3.31 12 bolt, Mayfair Maize.
1977 Trans Am W72 400, TH350, 3.23 T Top

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't.
Bill Nye.