The "4% per one full point of compression" is old/outdated information taken from one of the HO books.
In static terms it's probably pretty close, but in the real World the difference between 9 and 10 to 1 would be considerably more.
Here's why. Build a 400 engine with 8 to 1 compression, it will like a stock 066 cam or even a 204/214/112 cam or something close to it. Idle nice, good street manners, about 300hp or so.
Take the same 400, 9 to 1 compression, move up to the 068 cam, or a 214/224/112 cam and it will idle equally as well, good street manners, and at least another 40 hp or so.
Bump the compression up to 10 to 1, 224/234/112 or even move up to a Crower 60243 (228/235/112) cam, add high ratio rockers, Rhoads lifters and guess what. It will idle with plenty of vacuum for power brakes, great street manners, but closer to 400-430hp. Ours actually made 424hp on the dyno and 465 ft lbs torque with umported heads. Vacuum at idle speed 12" at 750-800rpms.
So a 1 point bump in compression opens the door for a larger cam with less negatives and considerably more than a 4 percent power increase.......Cliff
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
|