View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-13-2020, 10:01 AM
64-3Deuces's Avatar
64-3Deuces 64-3Deuces is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: MIdwest
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericisback View Post
The ad for this car:

https://www.harwoodmotors.com/vehicl...ls.php?id=1058

says when the car was judged, it was penalized for having a tri-power. Specifically, it says:

" When it was first completed, it carried a factory Tri-Power setup which was incorrect for this particular car. After being docked those points in competition, it was retrofitted with a correct intake manifold and Rochester QuadraJet 4-barrel, which it wears today (the Tri-Power setup is available to the car’s next owner, please contact us for details)."

So, there were 66 GTO's that did not have a tri-power carb.?
The standard 66 GTO engine was a 389 four barrel carb, the tripower being an option through 1966. I think the confusion lies in the sellers description “When it was first completed, it carried a factory Tri-Power setup which was incorrect for this particular car…" The “first completed” refers to the completion of the restoration when a correct year tripower was added. The car was PHS documented which apparently indicated that the car was a four barrel car that’s why the intake was retro fitted.