[Steve C.]

With the custom fabricated intake style like those from Hogan that large plenum allows individual runners to have the same cross section, length and all with a straight shot into the heads. Much different that a Torker II intake that has only four of it's runner lengths the same. And the Torker II has only two of it's runners with the same amount volume (cc).


With direct port fuel injection it has been stated one of the advantages of having a dry plenum and runners is that they can twist and turn more sharply to equalize airflow between cylinders without disrupting the air/fuel mixture. Does that apply with the Torker II intake ?


Edit: The statement here about the Hogan intake style was an assumption on my part. Tom, correct me if it does not apply.