Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulabruce
Dont worry about the HP. You'll have GOBS of Torque most likely BELOW where most Dynos begin to estimate HP.
Thats where you drive..
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones
The amount of dish you need really isn't going to affect much of anything at these power levels. If I were choosing, since the rotating assemblies cost about the same, I'd go with at least a 4.250 setup and just tailor the compression to what ever you want with the piston design and run with it.
|
I appreciate the insights. I figured I might be overthinking things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Davis
I am a big fan of the 4" stroke engines. If it was my build I would go 4". Moves the rpm range up a little bit and kills a little bottom end.
|
Is is the higher RPM that you like about the shorter stroke? Most of my driving will be normal cruising around town. My complaint about the last build was that it didn't wake up until 3k. I found myself downshifting a lot to get it in the power band. The cams I used were likely the main culprit (first a Crower 916, then a Lunati 702).
I put a call into a few shops today including
one up in Sonoma that built a RAII a couple years ago.
__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - 464 - Ram Air II heads - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (
build thread |
walk around)
'74 Ventura 350
'69 AMC Javelin SST