Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy
I disagree with the '79 SBC. For the most part, they were all very reliable. The first year flathead V8 had some bugs that later flathead V8's did not have. That said, they had a habit of cracking the blocks and vapor locking as part of their design. Not a super robust engine, IMO. Great for what it was at its price point 90 years ago, though. I started working in the auto industry in 1979 and can verify 100% the other engines being listed as total junk. Cadillac were the worst of the worst....and GM liked to use the consumer as their test bed, rather than the lab and test track, like the imports.
|
I also worked at a GM dealer during that period as a line Tech. The Cadillac HT 4100 was a super weak piece of junk. I remember going to a class at the GM Training Center in Cincinnati when it first came out. They made a huge deal out of the engine block weighing 57 lbs. I still remember that number. That was supposed to be a selling point! Three months into production, we started getting them in with main bearing knocking noise and metal in the oil. Most of them had 4 or 5 V-type accessory belts. GM issued a service bulletin stating that the belts, MUST be tightened with a belt tension gauge, and they supplied a revised set of belts, a little wider with rounded shoulders so they could be run at a newer, lower belt tension. The reason? Tightening the belts in the conventional manner would ruin the line hone and pull the block out of shape wiping out the main bearings. Yea, the perfect engine for a typical Cadillac owner. Yikes.