View Single Post
  #154  
Old 08-05-2023, 01:14 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 3,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gach View Post
I could be wrong, but either way the Crank has to come back out. To all of a sudden to end up with .010 clearance when first installed was 2.5 thousand tells me something else is going on. I don’t think it was packed to tight. So either crank is bent or line bore isn’t correct. Getting crank checked will answer allot of questions. Or main question.

Anyway thoughts on why all of a sudden he’d end up with .010 clearance ?
I think some signals got crossed here. Nothing is .010 clearance.

When I assembled the engine the #5 crank journal clearance measured .0035 while #1-#4 bearing clearances were .0024-.0025. I used a different bearing shell to get #5 to .0025. As far as I know, none of the clearances have changed.

I was pointing this out because it could indicate a problem with the line bore that I band aided with a different bearing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455 View Post
Just to say out loud, should wipe the surface with assembly lube, and not go dry.
I honestly have never seen a rear main seal do that. Was the drag on the crank excessive? After you dropped the crank in etc, did you check how much drag there was?
.
I used red assembly lube on the seal when I installed it, as the instructions say. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary with crank drag.

I may send a few pics to Best Gasket and see if they have anything to say. I'm sure they've seen it before. I'll still get the crank checked just in case.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - 464 - Ram Air II heads - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'74 Ventura 350
'69 AMC Javelin SST