[chiphead]

You guys still think Hyper pistons are a viable alternative? What about resistance to detonation and ring butting? Hyper pistons are high silicon content. They are dimensionally stable, but are brittle. Heavy detonation can crack them.
Some designs (particularly the KB hypers) tend to put a lot of heat in the top ring. In high power, nitrous or boosted engines, they tend to butt the top ring and tear the top of the piston off. They also cannot have dished milled in the top to lower compression. For a low compression, lesser than 400 HP builds, they would be an option. But if you get the bug for more HP, the hyper pistons quickly become a limiting factor to power production.

I used a set of Ross 2618 pistons in a long rod 400 nitrous street/strip motor. It ran for 10 years and about 15K miles. My only complaint was the piston slap when cold. Upon teardown, the pistons were good, even though the rings and bearings showed signs of being unhappy due to years of being run hard. The looser bore clearance makes some noise when cold and can shorten ring life. At least in 2004, the Ross pistons had limited options for customization. I sold those used Ross pistons to somebody here, they were still perfectly good.

Since I like to make the max power on pump gas and use nitrous, I have to use good pistons and rings. That 434 got the Autotec pistons and a $350 set of AP stainless LS style rings, torque plate honed, 6.8 BBC rods, the whole burrito. For a cruiser, the only pistons I would NEVER use would be a hypereutectic or the 8-eyebrow cast monster. Just be sure to consider the compression, camshaft choice, RPM range, gearing and risk of detonation with less expensive pistons and ring packs.