View Single Post
  #60  
Old 01-31-2025, 01:49 PM
Baron Von Zeppelin Baron Von Zeppelin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RLEngland View Post
Here's the PHS for N100942. Build date 01C. So the 997 means internal use? Meaning the dealer held onto it for awhile as a promotion car?.
I think we are getting into uncharted waters now.

Notice that your car #942 is colored/optioned identical to car #355 - 01A
Paul K says his car #354 - 01A is also identical colors/options.
They are beginning to resemble the first-fruit "Pattern Judge" scenario of Jan/Feb 1969
3 ultra early cars all built the same way.
Equipped - not stripped .

Your invoice of March 16 is when Marbert Motors got the car.
Paul's warranty plan shows his sold on March 14

997 historically has been the exit billing code for cars that had seen some type of use.
Most common use for suffix code 997 overall.

991 , 992 , 993 have been the common exit billing codes for cars that were stored inventory at various zone storage lots.
Un-Used / New .
The 1969 Pattern Judges that were stored at zone lots until the planned release in early Feb -
those all used the 991 992 993 ......

Car #942 has the same discount code 30 in lower left ledger,
and .00 HoldBack is another indicator of discounted vehicle.
But it doesn't spell it out like #355 invoice.

Also check out the similarity of the order numbers on them
01004 & 03004
69 Pattern Judges had coded order numbers also , not typical generic order numbers.

There may end up being more to this story if we get more invoices on these Jan built cars.
It is eyebrow raising / suspicious




Last edited by Baron Von Zeppelin; 01-31-2025 at 02:12 PM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: