Quote:
Originally Posted by BILL BOWMAN1
If GM’s intended goal with this engine was better fuel economy from less cubic inches, wouldn’t it have been way easier to cast up a 3” rotating assembly and use 350 blocks?
|
The piston and rod assemble would have been UGLY. I am sure Pontiac didn't shorten the deck height and then decide to run a 6.05" rod, but decide on the 6.05" rod and then what deck height would work with it.
Stan
__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm