Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455
5th time being pulled up, assuming they were sized (or checked) on the original build, and sized this upcoming time. But in my opinion, the bolts would still be good to use.
If you're leery about it, replace the bolts, and get the upgraded ones. Now would be the time to do that if you're having the rods sized.
I agree, top bearing half looks beaten from det. It's possible it's from being out of round, if the rods weren't originally sized/checked, but personally, I would replace the bolts, have them sized, and the crank checked too.
If you are going internally balanced, don't forget you need a neutral balancer, and would recommend an SFI one (if you don't already have one).
.
|
I use a pb1056ss. Internal balance it says. I put it on about 3-4 years ago, replacing the original balancer. The engine was originally balanced with the OEM balancer. When I put this on, I really wasn’t thinking of the balance, but it didn’t seem to affect it all.. sounds like a good idea if I get into this motor, which I probably will is to upgrade and replace the rod bolts. I find it odd that I don’t see any markings on these connecting rods at all saying a part number or a company. Or something.
__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
|