Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2005, 08:18 AM
Scott Fe Scott Fe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 4
Default

I have a "P" type 3.23 non-posi rear. I recently purchased a "P" type posi carrier unit from a car with 2.93 gears. My understanding is that the carrier for a 2.93 (mid-series) and 3.23 (low series) "P" type rear differs in where the ring gear mounting flange is positioned (which is necessary to accomodate the diffently sized pinion gears). However, I believe I CAN use the mid-series carrier with my low-series ring-gear IF I use a ring gear spacer orignally designed for a 12-bolt Chevy application.

Okay, all that out of the way, HERE is my question: Is the thickness of the Chevy ring gear I want to use (Mr. Gasket #902A), which is .310 inches, precisely the same as the distance I need to move the ring gear (ie closer to the pinion gear)?

Sorry for being wordy, and if I got any of the vocabulary wrong...I am on a steep learning curve! I would add, finally, that my car is street driven, not raced, so I am not terribly concerned about any reduced strengh associated with using longer ring gear bolts. Thanks for any advice.

  #2  
Old 05-04-2005, 08:18 AM
Scott Fe Scott Fe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 4
Default

I have a "P" type 3.23 non-posi rear. I recently purchased a "P" type posi carrier unit from a car with 2.93 gears. My understanding is that the carrier for a 2.93 (mid-series) and 3.23 (low series) "P" type rear differs in where the ring gear mounting flange is positioned (which is necessary to accomodate the diffently sized pinion gears). However, I believe I CAN use the mid-series carrier with my low-series ring-gear IF I use a ring gear spacer orignally designed for a 12-bolt Chevy application.

Okay, all that out of the way, HERE is my question: Is the thickness of the Chevy ring gear I want to use (Mr. Gasket #902A), which is .310 inches, precisely the same as the distance I need to move the ring gear (ie closer to the pinion gear)?

Sorry for being wordy, and if I got any of the vocabulary wrong...I am on a steep learning curve! I would add, finally, that my car is street driven, not raced, so I am not terribly concerned about any reduced strengh associated with using longer ring gear bolts. Thanks for any advice.

  #3  
Old 05-04-2005, 11:27 AM
mr67gp mr67gp is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pocono Mountains, PA
Posts: 256
Default

Scott,

I can't answer your question directly, but if you have both sets of gears and carriers, you have everything you need to measure the difference. I would suggest that you talk to an axle shop and explain what you are doing, and they should be able to jig up each unit and tell the difference in the critical dimension. Then you will know if the .310 spacer is adequate. If it is not, you could have a spacer of the correct thickness cut by a machine shop.

I have heard all of this before too, but have never come across anyone who actually has done it. Luckily I have found Saf-T-Trak units with the right gears for my cars, so never had to adapt.

Let us know what you find and how it works out.

__________________
Jim K in PA
1967 GP HT 428
1967 GP convert 428
1957 Chieftain 4D HT
  #4  
Old 05-04-2005, 12:48 PM
Scott Fe Scott Fe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks, Jim. Today I did speak with a guy at a local rear shop who says he has done the swap I am contemplating. He confirmed some info. I have seen posted in this forum before by oph (ol' pinion head). I still wasn't sure about some of the details, ie spacer thickness I mentioned above.

Only issue I have with measuring the units side by side is one of them is still in my car! I'd LIKE to bring my car to whatever shop I ultimately have do the job, and know that it will work before they take my differential apart. Was kinda hoping that with the right parts in hand, they could pull the axles, open the rear cover, remove my carrier and ring gear, swap my ring gear and the spacer onto the posi unit, put it back and shim it as needed. All with no snafus. After reading considerably on the subject and talking to a few guys, I feel relatively comfortable that it will work out, just wanted to have the benefit of as much advice as I can get.

  #5  
Old 05-04-2005, 12:53 PM
Scott Fe Scott Fe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 4
Default

One last thing, hope you Pontiac guys don't mind helping out an Olds guy...in the interest of "full disclosure", I guess I should mention that my car is a 1965 Oldsmobile Jetstar I (NOT a J88), and uses the Pontiac type rear gears.

  #6  
Old 05-04-2005, 03:22 PM
26667 26667 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grafton, Oh
Posts: 163
Default

Oh sure, now you tell us its an Olds!! If you have an interest in selling the non-posi carrier. please e-mail me (in my bio). I could use one, but not in a huge hurry for it, Joe

  #7  
Old 05-04-2005, 09:20 PM
MPKind's Avatar
MPKind MPKind is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Champlin, MN
Posts: 744
Default

How cool, a Jetstar I. Been a very long time since I've seen one.

__________________
65 Catalina 2D Post
  #8  
Old 06-08-2005, 08:16 PM
MPKind's Avatar
MPKind MPKind is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Champlin, MN
Posts: 744
Default

Here's a pic I took of a '65 Olds Jetstar I in 1986 in my H.S. parking lot for the school newspaper. Pretty f'ing clean .

__________________
65 Catalina 2D Post
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017