| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
11-03-2002, 04:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Been checking thr arcives regarding the crower 60916 & 60242. Very simmilar specs!
What would the diference be in a hicomp 400 in general? I know a couple of guys hve run this cam in a 400,any advice? Paul |
|
#2
11-03-2002, 04:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Been checking thr arcives regarding the crower 60916 & 60242. Very simmilar specs!
What would the diference be in a hicomp 400 in general? I know a couple of guys hve run this cam in a 400,any advice? Paul |
|
#3
11-03-2002, 07:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Have made great numbers with the 60916 cam on the dyno and at the track. It is a very good cam for 400 street engines with the early high compression heads. Have always used HS 1.65 rockers on it. Haven't tried the other cam mentioned as KRE stocks the 60916 and the specs are just about identical.....Cliff
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran! https://cliffshighperformance.com/ 73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile), |
| Reply |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Hybrid Mode
