Pontiac Business Entities Exchange Sources, Compliments and Grievances in regard to Pontiac parts or services rendered by an individual or business.

          
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-26-2005, 09:42 AM
KEN CROCIE KEN CROCIE is offline
Pontiac Performance Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga Ca.
Posts: 1,600
Default

I'm done with them.The last 5 sets of rods were not right in some way or another. The last set had to be sent back because 2 of the rods were ten grams light.The replacement set had a tight pin fit (the pin would not go in!)and there was a 4-5 tenths taper across the big end bore AND the big end was 7-8 tenths tight @ the parting line.Using Eagle's rod bolt stretch gauge(a nice simple item BTW)i determined the rods were not torqued up to spec when machined @ Eagle.The Crank for the same project had to have the thrust faces polished and the seal surface polished and the rod juornals were 4 tenths thinner in the center than the sides.Two of the main journals were off center by .002" and the crank had to be ground .010"to get it straight.My crank grinder says it's virtually impossible to grind only two journals off center but there they were!

__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017