| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
In Sep. 2005 I decided to address the pinging during part throttle acceleration. After reading many posts, I removed my vacuum advance can to find out it was delivering about 20* of advance.
So I purchased and installed a Crane adjustable can. Before connecting it, I set the initial timing to where I would not get any pinging on WOT test runs up a long hill. Then I connected the vac adv can and adjusted it to where I would not get any pinging during part throttle acceleration. Performance was OK. Fast forward to May 2006. After reading a ton more on timing (just a bit addicted to this forum ), I realized that maybe the better adjustment would be to limit the total vac advance with the provided cam plate instead of what vacuum level it comes in at. So I decided to start by mapping my mechanical timing curve. With a digital inductive tach, vacuum gauge and timing light, this is what I found.Rpm...............Timing...............Vac 550 (initial).......5-6................11-12 700..................8...................17 825.................12...................18 1050................14...................20 1450................16...................22 1900................18 2150................20 2350................22 2500................24 2800................26 3000................26 So it looks like I'm getting about 20* of mechanical advance. Reading so many post that say about 34-38* all in by about 2800prm is best, I decided to set the initial to 15* to get a total of 35*. I also install the vacuum advance limiting plate and limited the advance to 0* as a starting point. Go for a ride and it runs pretty good, except when I floor it, it pings pretty badly. Hmmm.... So today I decided to remove the mechanical advance springs to allow full timing advance at low rpm to see what I was really getting. To my amazement, I am getting 40* of mechanical advance. With 15* initial, I read 55* at idle.- Could this be correct? - Is this a valid way to check for maximum mechanical advance? - Do I have the wrong center plate and weight combo? - Is my testing methodology valid? I need to get my mechanical advance dialed in before I can even mess with vac advance. After all the hours surfing this board, I know I can't forget the specifics. 1966 GTO '72 455 stock long block (155,000+ miles) Summit 2800 cam Performer intake Holley Avenger 670 carb HEI ignition - 389 center plate - 139 weights - Crane adj vac can Muncie 4 speed
__________________
![]() Some people say I have A.D.D., but they don't know what they're talk ... hey look, a chicken!
|
|
|