| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Funny how the N/A internal combustion V-8 engine shows so many similarities following a few basic guidelines for setting them up, no matter what brand they are........Cliff"
In the article BruceWilkie linked to earlier (post #45), the author uses two examples of good vs. poor (for CR purposes) combustion chamber design, the Cadillac Northstar and the Hemi. I recall him saying the 2000 Caddy redesign allowed them to get up to 10-1 SCR on 87 octane (the second example I know of in this thread after LT1s.) So it appears those more modern chambers that everyone begged Edelbrock for (in Pontiac heads) are also a big part of that ideal combo. Now we even have them coming into the market for the masses. --so, I'll try a brief recap, as the thread grows, of responses to the original question: I. Major factors/variables beyond SCR include: -Dynamic compression ratio /cranking compression (as determined by cam events like LSA and IC--NOT overlap as is often assumed) -RPM range the engine operates in (determined by gearing and driving purpose) -Quench distance (pistons down the cylinder) -head material (iron vs aluminum) -cooling system efficiency -fuel quality, in addition to octane -combustion chamber design I'm sure I missed some--did it from memory. II. The major points of contention seem to be: -Should a "safe" SCR (8-1? 9-1?) be observed by non-tuners, even those who read these forums and are trying to learn more about high performance? Is SCR even useful as a guideline, given the many other variables? -Should camshaft LSA be wide or tight for a Pontiac, and for what purpose (part-throttle cruising? drag racing? dual-purpose? remembering that this is the "Street" section)? -What is the useful limit of dynomometer data for street-perf vehicles? I'll be happy to edit omissions/inaccuracies if they're pointed out. Last edited by mechanic17; 02-17-2011 at 04:59 PM. |
|
|