| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My problem lies in the 'information' overload portion of this new mirror. It's wonderful that it shows so much, but that's also its downfall... perspective is lost. It's the same reason we all look in our convex mirrors on the right side of our cars, and even if we see something there, we don't know how close it really is without turning our heads. In the picture, notice how much smaller the silver Honda appears in the new mirror vs. the original mirror? It's very difficult to judge distance in these instances, and it's why we have that disclaimer on our right side convex mirrors now... "Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear." You simply must look over your shoulder to get a proper perspective of where the car actually is when viewed thru a convex mirror. Standard or Convex, I will always turn my head to look.
__________________
Eric Mitten '74 Bonneville 4dr Sedan (455/TH400/2.93 open) '72 LeMans GT (455/M-13/3.23 [8.5"] posi) '71 GTO Hardtop (400/TH400/3.07 12 bolt posi) ‘71 GTO Convertible (455HO/TH400/3.23 posi) '67 GTO Coupe (455/ST-10/2.93 posi) Deuteronomy 8:3
|
|
|